Roskam should investigate Bush Iraq war crimes, not Benghazi
Visit my Illinois Sixth District Congressman Peter Roskam's website, www.roskam.house.gov and you'll find 3 of the 4 'Latest News' headlines deal with Benghazi and Roskam's appointment to the Select House Committee investigating that September, 2012 terrorist incident. This utterly partisan political stunt is nothing but the latest GOP effort to undermine the Obama administration and derail the likely presidential election of Hillary Clinton in 2016. The House GOP, including their No. 4 leader Roskam, have capitulated in their effort to destroy the Affordable Care Act as their sole strategy to regain the White House. Thirteen Benghazi investigations should spell the end of this hyped, overworked issue, but if the House GOP can vote against the Affordable Care Act 55 times, they can launch investigation number 14 against Obama and Clinton on Benghazi. Roskam and his fellow House GOP leaders are nothing if not stubborn...and foolhardy.
Since Congressman Roskam will never vote to improve the nations health care needs, never vote to raise the nation's poverty level minimum wage, never vote to extend unemployment insurance to the millions out of work and never vote for a single jobs creation bill that doesn't involve senseless war, the Congressman investigate something truly important and neglected. I refer to the uninvestigated potential war crimes of the Bush administration in launching their frightful war of aggression against Iraq in 2003. While most honest folks around the world believe this was a criminal war deserving of punishment, that will remain conjecture till fully investigated. One reason Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice never leave the good 'ol USA is that they subject themselves to possible arrest for Iraq war crimes. President Bush even cancelled a speaking trip to normally friendly Switzerland over calls by human rights groups for this arrest.
It's understandable you will never see the Iraq war crimes issue get a single mention on Roskam's web site. Entering Congress in 2007, Roskam immediately pledged allegiance to the war party, voting for every one of the hundreds of billions of dollars in their failed Iraq and Afghan wars and joining in the chorus risking war with Iran over hyped nuclear programs. Roskam signaled his allegiance in a 2006 debate at College of DuPage where he said, "I don't have a strategy to win in Iraq, I have a goal... that it end well so we don't have to go back." Mr. Congressman, it didn't end well for hundreds of thousands of Americans dead, wounded, or suffering from PTSD. It didn't end well for millions of Iraqis. If you think it did, consider a trip there, to see first hand the carnage and desolation you helped enable.
Congressman Roskam might be adverse to investigating potential Bush era war crimes in Iraq considering he had this to say on September 21, 2006, when running for Congress: "the U.S. should stay the course...and...U.S. troops should not return home until Iraq is safe. He further stated that "the Sixth District is not a cut and run district" when criticizing his first Congressional opponent Tammy Duckworth, seriously wounded serving in Iraq, who had infinitely more experience and wisdom than Roskam to speak against the Iraq war folly. A month later Roskam upped the ante on his unrepentant Iraq war support arguing Bush goofed by not going into Iraq with "full force". Apparently, hundreds of thousands dead and millions wounded or made homeless doesn't constitute "full force" in Roskam's worldview. Then, in one of his most astonishing statements, freshman Congressman Roskam supported the 2007 war escalation saying, "There are encouraging reports coming out of Iraq that Baghdad is becoming more secure, and the insurgency is being mitigated."
Maybe, it's not a good idea to have Roskam participate in a House Select Committee on potential Bush Iraq war crimes. It might just hit a tad close to home.
Since Congressman Roskam will never vote to improve the nations health care needs, never vote to raise the nation's poverty level minimum wage, never vote to extend unemployment insurance to the millions out of work and never vote for a single jobs creation bill that doesn't involve senseless war, the Congressman investigate something truly important and neglected. I refer to the uninvestigated potential war crimes of the Bush administration in launching their frightful war of aggression against Iraq in 2003. While most honest folks around the world believe this was a criminal war deserving of punishment, that will remain conjecture till fully investigated. One reason Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice never leave the good 'ol USA is that they subject themselves to possible arrest for Iraq war crimes. President Bush even cancelled a speaking trip to normally friendly Switzerland over calls by human rights groups for this arrest.
It's understandable you will never see the Iraq war crimes issue get a single mention on Roskam's web site. Entering Congress in 2007, Roskam immediately pledged allegiance to the war party, voting for every one of the hundreds of billions of dollars in their failed Iraq and Afghan wars and joining in the chorus risking war with Iran over hyped nuclear programs. Roskam signaled his allegiance in a 2006 debate at College of DuPage where he said, "I don't have a strategy to win in Iraq, I have a goal... that it end well so we don't have to go back." Mr. Congressman, it didn't end well for hundreds of thousands of Americans dead, wounded, or suffering from PTSD. It didn't end well for millions of Iraqis. If you think it did, consider a trip there, to see first hand the carnage and desolation you helped enable.
Congressman Roskam might be adverse to investigating potential Bush era war crimes in Iraq considering he had this to say on September 21, 2006, when running for Congress: "the U.S. should stay the course...and...U.S. troops should not return home until Iraq is safe. He further stated that "the Sixth District is not a cut and run district" when criticizing his first Congressional opponent Tammy Duckworth, seriously wounded serving in Iraq, who had infinitely more experience and wisdom than Roskam to speak against the Iraq war folly. A month later Roskam upped the ante on his unrepentant Iraq war support arguing Bush goofed by not going into Iraq with "full force". Apparently, hundreds of thousands dead and millions wounded or made homeless doesn't constitute "full force" in Roskam's worldview. Then, in one of his most astonishing statements, freshman Congressman Roskam supported the 2007 war escalation saying, "There are encouraging reports coming out of Iraq that Baghdad is becoming more secure, and the insurgency is being mitigated."
Maybe, it's not a good idea to have Roskam participate in a House Select Committee on potential Bush Iraq war crimes. It might just hit a tad close to home.
posted by Walt Zlotow at 11:20 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home