Chicago Tribune clueless on Joe Biden’s unfitness to remain president
The Chicago Tribune editorial ‘How the Democrats are giving the country what it doesn’t want — a Trump-Biden rematch’ was only half right.
It correctly argues the Democrats are giving America what it doesn’t want. But it’s not a Trump-Biden rematch. It’s infinitely more ominous…the worst foreign policy in US history.
Biden got off to a good start by quickly ending America’s disastrous 20 year war in Afghanistan. But he’s doubled, tripled and quadrupled down on other perpetual warfare thruout his first term.
He’s provoked and enabled the Russian war in Ukraine, sabotaging every effort to end it early on. Ukraine is no longer a sustainable country without US life support. Hundreds of thousands are unnecessarily dead.
He’s expanded both provocative rhetoric and military maneuvers against North Korea and China in the Far East.
He’s enabled and supported Israel’s near genocidal ethnic cleansing of Gaza following Hamas’ attacks.
He’s committed to a second hundred billion of scarce American treasure to fund these totally unnecessary, self-destructive policies.
The question should not be whether an 82-year-old Joe Biden can finish a second term at age 86. It should be whether the American people will survive another year with him in office provoking nuclear war with Russia, China and North Korea simultaneously.
West Suburban Peace Coalition
Published: Nov 02, 2023 at 5:00 am
Think back five years — challenging, we know, given all that’s transpired since then — but Joe Biden at the time seriously considered whether to declare he would serve just one term if elected president of the United States.
It was late 2019, and he was struggling to gain traction in a crowded Democratic primary field and needing to set himself apart from his younger rivals. We know now he made no such pledge and won the prize anyway.
But the belief lingered well past his defeat of Donald Trump in 2020 that, once his term ended, he could well cede the mantle of Democratic Party leader, given his age. As an unnamed (and apparently unheeded) Biden campaign adviser categorically told Politico in late 2019, “He’s going to be 82 years old in four years and he won’t be running for reelection.”
So much for categoricals. The oldest president ever is indeed vying for another four years. A Trump rematch is highly likely at this point.
And Americans over many months have expressed unhappiness to pollsters about having to choose between these two again. Third-party candidacies are proliferating, with both GOP and Democratic operatives fretting about how they might tip the scales in battleground states, and a lingering sense that our politics is simply broken.
Republican dysfunction, spotlighted most recently in the excruciating three-week-long effort to elect a new House speaker, has garnered most of the recent attention from the D.C. press corps. But Democratic Party angst, simmering all the while, is beginning to surface. And while we think Biden has been at his most impressive since Oct. 7, the war between Israel and Hamas has not helped party unity.
Biden’s approval numbers are at lows for his presidency and in a danger zone for any incumbent seeking reelection. His supporters within the party are growing increasingly frustrated, wondering why voters won’t give him credit for the surprisingly resilient economy, reflected in jobs and wage growth.
Biden, too, has taken political risks that paid off. He publicly backed the United Auto Workers in their job action — even pro-labor presidents over many decades have opted not to take sides in strikes — and the UAW emerged with a victory. Don’t back no losers, goes the old refrain. Biden picked the winner in a high-stakes battle. But he also demonstrated his pro-worker bona fides, something you’d think would be reflected in polling.
Not yet. And, if past is prologue with other Biden successes over his term, maybe not ever.
So where does this leave Democrats as the specter of Trump’s grievance run looms? Out of options, it seems. And simply hoping their octogenarian standard-bearer comes through, somehow, someway.
Biden’s prospects would be brighter if his running mate was widely perceived as capable of taking over should the need arise. But Kamala Harris simply hasn’t convinced many Americans of that, and she is another political negative. Yet conventional wisdom is that Biden can’t replace her for fear of upsetting Black voters, a crucial part of his base.
Harris’ unpopularity isn’t a second-tier issue for the campaign. In polling, two-thirds of Americans, including many Democrats, say they don’t think Biden will complete a second term if reelected. Effectively, then, two out of three voters believe they’re voting for Harris for president rather than Biden, at least for a portion of the coming four years. You can rely on that being a Republican refrain as the campaign heats up next year.
The situation is such that an obscure centrist Democrat from Minnesota, U.S. Rep. Dean Phillips, just decided to challenge Biden. No one gives him a chance, but Phillips’ campaign message is resonant: He expresses nothing but admiration for Biden and the job he’s done. But Americans think Biden’s too old — fair or not — and they’re sour on Harris. Fair or not. Phillips’ message can’t be dismissed; Democratic Party leaders are in the anxious position of having to do just that because of the trick box they’re in.
The most likely outcome? Biden and Harris are renominated, as is Trump. Grumpy Americans go to the polls, unhappy to be replaying the 2020 drama. The country then must bite its nails, worried that disenchantment with Biden puts a rage-filled Trump, saddled with multiple indictments, in charge for four years of God knows what.
It didn’t have to be like this. Biden could have chosen a better running mate in 2020. Harris, after all, hadn’t distinguished herself in her own presidential run. She started as one of the top possibilities and quickly fizzled out amid disarray in her campaign. That kind of performance on the trail doesn’t usually lead to a spot on the presidential ticket.
He also could have made it clear earlier this year, or even a few months ago, that he was passing the torch.
